Cleveland’s must address inadequate steps to end lead poisoning in children: editorial

Cleveland’s must address  inadequate steps to end lead poisoning in children: editorial

Cleveland’s children have been plagued for decades by exposure to lead, an environmental hazard that causes irreversible harm. But Cleveland is in danger of forfeiting $11.9 million in federal funding for lead abatement because City Hall again failed to spend the money fast enough.The Plain Dealer

Cleveland’s children have been plagued for decades by exposure to lead, an environmental hazard that causes irreversible harm.

And while Cleveland’s leadership, public and private, has harrumphed over and over that aggressive action is needed, City Hall continues to display a decades-old level of incompetence. The revelation now that Cleveland is in danger of forfeiting $11.9 million in federal funding for lead abatement because City Hall again failed to spend the money fast enough is absolutely stunning.

Drastic change is needed.

Lead affects the brain, heart, bones, kidneys, and nervous system and there are no safe levels once it is in the bloodstream. When it builds up in the body it can lead to serious problems, such as neurological damage, which may not show up until adulthood.
Federal grants in 2020 and 2022 totaling $15.4 million were intended to identify and remove lead from homes to protect children. Mayor Justin Bibb, who took office in January 2022, still has $11.9 million left to spend. Both grants will expire this year, with $7.6 million expiring on May 30.

Community Development Director Alyssa Hernandez recently told City Council that at one time it appeared possible that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development would grant Cleveland more time. But she acknowledged that may not be possible with President Donald Trump’s new administration, Sean McDonnell of cleveland.com and The Plain Dealer reported. “I don’t know if the people that I work with on a regular basis that are in D.C. are even empowered to make a decision to expand that grant,” Hernandez told the council.

That misses the larger point. Cleveland’s failure to adequately ramp up its efforts against lead — under Bibb and several previous mayors — is simply outrageous. Lead poisoning is the single biggest health issue facing children in the city of Cleveland. More than 90% of the city’s rental units were built before 1978 — the year lead-based paint was banned, and many residents, especially low-income renters, live in dwellings with lead hazards, according to the Cleveland Lead Safe Coalition, an independent nonprofit. It’s not just in paint chips. Surfaces in the home that rub against each other, like windows and doors, can produce dust with lead in it that ends up on surfaces or floats in the air. Ingesting less than a teaspoon of dust — the size of a sugar packet— can cause serious, long-term harm for a child, the coalition says.
Yet City Hall can’t get the money out the door.
Former Mayors Michael R. White, Jane Campbell and Frank Jackson – Cleveland’s leaders dating from the 1990s, all fell short of the mark, just as Bibb’s administration has. Data released last October showed that since 2019, when city passed a lead-safe law to protect young children, there was no change in the rate of Cleveland kids getting poisoned. Exposure rates in Cleveland remained higher than Detroit, Cincinnati, Toledo and Akron. Those rates actually increased between 2022 and 2023.

The Bibb administration told the City Council that complex layers of federal regulation made it difficult to get the money out the door. That’s an excuse – one that’s unacceptable. It’s not like the feds suddenly just sprung new regulations on the city. What’s clear is that the city needs to elevate its efforts, putting more resources and people into the programs, finding creative ways to spend the money and abate lead in households.

 

Bibb should find a point person to direct nothing by lead removal efforts – a sort-of lead czar in charge of an extensive staff focused on finding residences, getting them qualified, and spending the federal funding.  If Cleveland needs to spend more of its own money toward staffing the effort, so be it. It should have done that long ago. If Bibb cannot find someone to run the program internally, he should look outside city government – perhaps creating an independent commission that does nothing by lead abatement.

At the extreme, perhaps Gov. Mike DeWine and the state should take over the efforts.

What’s absolutely clear is that the status quo cannot continue. All the excuses ring hollow as another generation of Cleveland’s youth suffers brain damage from lead poisoning.

About our editorials: Editorials express the view of the editorial board of cleveland.com and The Plain Dealer — the senior leadership and editorial-writing staff. As is traditional, editorials are unsigned and intended to be seen as the voice of the news organization.

source